The Tax Situation Your Athletes Are Walking Into Unprepared. Why That Is Your Program's Problem and Yours to Solve.
The IRS designated NIL a high-risk enforcement category in 2025. Self-employment tax runs 15.3%. Most college athletes have never filed a tax return. The gap between those facts and your current financial literacy offering is the liability you have not yet priced.
The IRS Has Already Moved
The Internal Revenue Service does not wait for financial literacy programs to catch up with new income categories. Its current guidance on NIL income is unambiguous: all compensation received through name, image, and likeness activity is taxable income, including non-cash compensation received as merchandise, travel, gift cards, or other goods and services at fair market value. Athletes classified as independent contractors report this income on Schedule C and owe self-employment tax at 15.3% on net self-employment income up to $184,500 in 2026.
The February 2026 analysis published by the Texas Society of CPAs documented the consistent pattern tax professionals encounter when advising NIL athletes: no estimated tax payments have been made, self-employment tax is not understood, filing thresholds are unknown, and 1099-NEC forms and W-9 obligations are unfamiliar. The IRS, the analysis noted, considers NIL income as ordinary income but sees it internally as high-risk due to inexperienced taxpayers, significant unreported earnings, non-cash compensation, multi-state issues, insufficient business deduction documentation, and lack of 1099 reporting.
Sources: Texas CPA Society, February 2026; IRS NIL Income Guidance; SDO CPA, April 2026.
The Quarterly Obligation Most Athletes Miss
The federal tax system operates on a pay-as-you-go basis. Employees have taxes withheld from each paycheck automatically. Independent contractors do not. An athlete who receives $40,000 in NIL compensation during a calendar year and makes no estimated tax payments until April 15 of the following year has not deferred a tax obligation. They have incurred underpayment penalties calculated as interest on the amount that should have been paid at each of the four quarterly deadlines: April 15, June 15, September 15, and January 15.
The SDO CPA analysis provides the arithmetic plainly: $40,000 in net NIL income generates $6,120 in self-employment tax alone, before federal income tax at the applicable bracket. For a dependent on a parent's return in the 24% bracket, the combined obligation can approach $16,000 on $40,000 in earnings. The 2026 increase in the 1099-NEC threshold from $600 to $2,000 compounds this problem. Athletes and some advisors are misreading this as a reduced tax obligation rather than simply reduced paperwork for paying entities. The tax liability on income below $2,000 has not changed. The documentation that would prompt awareness of it has.
Sources: SDO CPA, April 2026; TurboTax NIL Guide, December 2025; Albin Randall Bennett, December 2025.
The Multi-State Problem
An athlete who lives in a state without income tax but makes appearances, posts content pursuant to contracts, or performs services in states that do impose income tax may have filing obligations in those states. The jock tax, the principle of taxing income based on where athletic services are performed, is being applied with increasing frequency to college athletes with NIL income in states including Illinois. For athletes who transferred schools in 2025 or 2026, part-year residency rules in multiple states create additional complexity. For international student-athletes classified as nonresident aliens, the obligation to file Form 1040-NR applies to NIL income regardless of whether any tax forms were received.
The University of Maryland's TerpTax program has documented multi-state complications as among the most common sources of filing errors in its athlete clientele. These are not edge cases. They are the predictable consequences of a multi-billion-dollar income category that expanded faster than the financial literacy infrastructure available to the people generating it.
Sources: SDO CPA, April 2026; University of Maryland TerpTax, June 2025; YSBR Tax Guide, February 2025.
What Programs Owe Their Athletes
The question of institutional obligation in NIL financial literacy is not philosophical in 2026. Programs that invited athletes into a $2.75 billion commercial market, facilitated their access to brand deals and institutional revenue sharing, and provided no systematic financial literacy support have created a predictable outcome: athletes with IRS obligations they cannot meet, compliance failures they cannot correct retroactively, and financial situations directly traceable to institutional decisions that prioritized deal volume over athlete outcomes.
The standard is defined not by the House settlement but by the recruiting promises programs made and the institutional duty of care that follows from inviting eighteen-year-olds into commercial financial relationships with material tax consequences. Programs that provide a how NIL works overview at freshman orientation and nothing further are not meeting that standard. Programs that build systematic financial literacy curriculum covering entity structuring, quarterly tax payment planning, multi-state filing awareness, and ongoing advisor referral pathways are.
Financial literacy is not a nice-to-have in an NIL program. It is the component that determines whether athletes leave your program better off financially than when they arrived. That outcome is within your institution's control.
Sources: Texas CPA Society, February 2026; Merrill Lynch Athlete Study, March 2026; IRS NIL Guidance, April 2026.
ROLA builds the business infrastructure behind athletic programs, NIL collectives, and the institutions developing the next generation of athlete-entrepreneurs. The strategy session is where that work begins.
Book a Strategy Session →